Humanity for the Environment, Not Vice Versa

Imagine two trees: one grows on the edge of a highway, while the other thrives deep within an untouched forest. Most people would agree that the second tree has a better chance of living a long and healthy life. If we tried to extend the life of the first tree, we might use advanced techniques like steroids or gene editing. However, the core problem lies in its environment, not the tree itself. The same principle applies to humanity—if we want to ensure a long and prosperous future, we must focus on improving the world around us. By understanding our impact on the environment, addressing the damage we’ve caused, and recognizing how a healthy environment benefits us, we can create a sustainable future.

Humans have profoundly shaped the environment, often to its detriment. The global population has exploded, quadrupling to eight billion in just a century, putting immense pressure on the planet’s carrying capacity. Already, 95% of Earth’s surface has been altered by human activity, fragmenting ecosystems and threatening wildlife. Pollution, such as plastics in the ocean, harms animals and ecosystems, while also affecting human health. Diseases like asthma and cancer have been linked to the emissions and waste we produce. Clearly, our current trajectory is unsustainable, harming not only the planet but also ourselves.

Thankfully, solutions exist to reverse this damage. Tackling issues like plastic waste, transitioning to renewable energy, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions can significantly mitigate our environmental impact. For example, adding filters to washing machines can reduce microplastic pollution, while investments in renewable energy can cut emissions and save trillions of dollars annually. Transitioning to cleaner transportation, like electric vehicles, is another vital step toward sustainability. These efforts not only repair the environment but also pave the way for a healthier, more resilient planet.

A thriving environment directly benefits humanity. Forests, for instance, provide resources essential to modern medicine and contribute to mental and physical well-being. Studies show that spending time in nature reduces stress, boosts immunity, and improves mental health. Additionally, shifting to plant-based diets can reduce food-related emissions and improve global health. By protecting and restoring the environment, we secure both our health and our future.

Some argue that geopolitical challenges make these changes difficult, as nations prioritize short-term economic gains over long-term sustainability. However, this mindset is shortsighted. Neglecting the environment today creates ethical and practical problems for future generations, much like leaving broken glass in the woods harms those who come after. Addressing these issues now is not only necessary but morally imperative.

In the end, improving our environment ensures humanity’s survival and prosperity. Just like the tree in the forest, we thrive when our surroundings support us. By acknowledging our impact, repairing the damage, and appreciating the benefits of a healthy world, we can build a sustainable future for generations to come.

Márquez’s Criticism of the Role of Religion in Chronicle of a Death Foretold

Paperback Chronicle of a Death Foretold Book

Chronicle of a Death Foretold is a book in the magical realism genre and set rural Columbia. It was written by Gabriel Garcia Marquez and was published in 1981. It follows a detective attempting to solve a murder that happened many years ago and is based on a true story. Please note that it was originally written in Spanish, so some elements may not translate exactly.

I recently read Chronicle of a Death Foretold and my biggest takeaway was how Marquez explored and criticized the role of religion. Marquez criticized religion in this book through the prestige of religious leaders, the townspeople’s treatment and views of the community, and by showing how people justify inaction with religion.

First of all, Marquez highlights the faults of religious leaders like the bishop and Father Amador, showing the community’s blind reverence towards them despite their incompetence and moral failings. Secondly, the community’s respect for characters like Santiago, Angela, Bayardo, and the twins is influenced by religious beliefs, leading to misplaced priorities and justifications for harmful actions. Finally, the townspeople use religion to absolve themselves of responsibility, demonstrating the bystander effect and moral decay influenced by religious justification.

Throughout the book, various characters demonstrate the misplaced priorities and moral degradation of the community. The bishop’s arrival and the townspeople’s excitement highlight the significant role of religion. Father Amador’s inaction and incompetence are shown through his failure to prevent Santiago’s murder and his disrespectful treatment of Santiago’s body. The community’s judgment of Angela’s purity and their pity for Bayardo reflect the influence of religious norms. The twins’ justification of Santiago’s murder as an act of honor under God’s will shows the corrupting influence of religion. These are just a few of the instances in which the theme of the corrupting role of religion is demonstrated in this book.

These themes are consistent and expanded upon throughout Chronicle of a Death Foretold, and through them, Márquez effectively demonstrates the negative effects of religion in society, leading to social and moral degradation, and ultimately, Santiago Nasar’s death. I would highly recommend the book and would encourage readers to look out for these details and themes. Through this, they will truly appreciate Márquez as an author.

Chronicle of a Death Foretold by Gabriel Garcia Marquez is available to checkout from the Mission Viejo Library.